Twitter Photos RSS Feed
 
 
 

Just the fact that “waiting in line” is an unwritten rule we all follow willing is kind of baffling when you think about. And they say people don’t care anymore. Eitherway, we all follow the rules and wait our turn kindly.


Recently, however, the rules of lines seem to be changing. I attribute most of this change to the methods by which people are going about their daily business at stores. I think at one point in time there were separate lines for each outlet…meaning there was a line for each register at the store. You’re at the grocery store and there are four lanes open and there are four lines.


Now with the advent of self-checkouts the rules have been changed seemingly by revolution because now there is just one line that forms way out in the aisle where everyone waits for the next open register.


Say there are four self-checkouts, two on either side of a space. Instead of a line forming behind each one, there is just one line and people take their turns. In some ways this makes perfect sense - it eliminates the quarrels that could arise. But the downside is there is now one long ass line that winds its way down through the aisles disrupting other shoppers and just messing up everything else.


In some places, like fast food places and banks, they solve the single line disruption by putting out barriers that direct you where to go. This is acceptable; One line that is dictated by the establishment. When the line is dictated by the people, you’ll never get anything practical.


A recent experience I had at a local Wendy’s just awakened my mind to this problem. I walked in for lunch and there were no mazes telling you were to go. There were two registers, both with cashiers, and two guys were waiting in line for the one on the right, and the left one was open. My impression was those guys were waiting for that register, one line per register. So I walk over to the left register and the cashier looked at me like I was nuts. Thus she points over to the guys waiting in the other line. I look back and ask, “is there just one line?” She didn’t answer and just pointed.


I gave in because I didn’t want to create a problem, but it is the exact type of problem that happens all over the place. But I bet had someone come in the entrance on the left side of the building and gone right to the open register no one would have said, “hey, you go to the end of this line because this line goes everywhere.”


When there is one line that wiggles its way all around tarnation you have know idea who is in line, who isn’t and what they’re waiting in line for.


Let’s look at the bank drive-thru. You pull up and all the lanes are equally full. You pick lane A and wait to be next. Another car pulls up and gets behind the car line in lane B. Lane B gets done first and the car that came after you gets to go first. Do you get out and say, “woah dude, I was here first, wait your turn.” No. You suffer because you picked a line and it juts so happens it was the fast lane. Tough shit. That’s how it works.


Waiting in a single long line just isn’t practical - very democratic and nice - but not practical. It confuses people and takes up a lot of space. Let’s look at a crude diagram.


The first shows what I experienced; a single line off-center going to a single register when there are clearly two open registers. The second shows what is happening at the self-checkout at places like Kroger; taking up room and not clearly defining anything.


Some simple solutions that were once the norm are like this, where there is a line for each open register. For self-checkouts, it makes sense to have one line for each side, with the first person moving up to the first checkout then filling in the second. This way you’re not getting in the way of others and people know why you’re standing around.


Not until things like the self-checkout did this type of thinking start becoming the norm. Before these things everyone went to one line for each place. No questions asked. If you didn’t like the line you were in, you switched lines. Now we’re seemingly forcing everyone to be in one line.


Let’s get with it and start making things work for us, not against us.

 
Mar 18, 2005 | New problems waiting in line |
 

4 Comments

  1. Thee says:

    Just to out this out there:

    It is statisaclly faster to have 1 line and multiple nodes (i.e. registers, ATMs, drive-thru lines, etc). Thats why places where lines are the norm have 1 long line that breaks out at the very end (Theme parks, airports, etc.) If you want details I can provide them, but I’ll need to find my stats book.

  2. Brian says:

    Frankly, if one line is faster that is fine, I believe it. But then the problem is controlling that one big line and defining where it should go.

    Like at theme parks. You have one long line that is defined by bars and rails and everything else. With none of that at places like the grocery store and apparently some fast food places, they just start the line wherever they feel like and no rules govern.

    I guess I’m not arguing there should be two lines for places like that, I don’t care how many lines. So long as it is clearly marked I’ll be happy.

  3. Thee says:

    YA, I strongly agree. Even when there is only one node the line should be managed. Like at the movies, nothing drives crazy like having some mother and her child just walk right into the theater while I’m back there standing the correct line.

    Maybe they can offer some sort of degree at Columbus State. You could have an associates degree in “Line Management”.

    And to your note…those self-check out lines need managed. There is always that one guy who sees that there is 1 line, but proceeds to stand right behind one of sides..apparently under the assumption that everyone else is waiting for the other side.

  4. Jen says:

    I think the problem with the self-checkout system is that it feels like there isn’t authority.